240 vs 144hz reddit 360hz - 2. 240hz is a decent jump in clarity compared to 144, just keep in mind its not the same level as going from 60 to 144. I recently switched from a 1440p 240 Hz monitor to a 4K 144 Hz monitor. May 25, 2020 · 1440p 144hz. 540Hz - 1. Owner of a 240Hz monitor here. Other than that 144Hz is plenty smooth. 85 Milliseconds. The biggest difference I noticed was in motion clarity. Hardware Unboxed youtube channel has great monitor reviews and round ups so I'd just follow their recommendations. We should honestly consider whether it even makes sense to keep pushing frametime down once it's as short or shorter than pixel response time. it's a noticeable difference, but I wouldn't throw away a a good 144hz monitor just for the upgrade. 60hz - 16. say for example you get 90 fps in a game, turn on frame gen and you'll be at around 170 fps and outside the freesync/gsync range of a 144/165 to 240+. These 240 Hz monitors aren't meant for those kinds of games, they appeal to a very specific niche, which is professional gamers or at the very least very competitive gamers. I went from 144hz to 300hz and the difference is definitely noticeable, but not to the same degree as 60hz to 144hz. But seeing as you mainly play CS2 I’d definitely go for 240 Hz. I'm thinking about upgrading to a 4080 together with either a 27" 1440p 240 hz monitor or a 32" 4k 144hz. The difference between 240hz and 144hz has diminishing returns compared with going from 60hz to 144hz and the gain in detail from the resolution is a far more noticeable upgrade. This gets even worse with 360Hz displays. The we did 120hz vs 144hz got some missed some , then 144hz vs 240hz, there is an improvement in fluidity , and any sort of ghosting or “blur” is 100% gone, movement looks sharp. But here’s the thing, if you have never experienced 240Hz, 165 Hz or 144 Hz will feel smooth. A great 144 Hz monitor is better than a bad 240 Hz monitor. I absolutely did notice the difference between 240 Hz and 144 Hz in CS2. Linus Tech Tips has a pretty cool video with some pro gamers comparing 144hz vs 240hz. 60 -> 120/144hz - the jump is massive, like unreal the level of difference. On 240Hz (if you can get >240 fps) you can see everything much more clearly and 144Hz looks ever so slightly blurry in comparison. Don't buy one expecting it to give you a huge advantage over 144Hz owners, it won't. There's a noticeable difference between 144 Hz and 240Hz, motion is a lot clearer and mouse inputs feel much smoother and more responsive, especially in FPS games but you can feel it generally. 66 Milliseconds. The jump from 60hz to 144hz felt immensily higher than from 144hz to 240hz, to give a reference. 94 Milliseconds. The question is does it matter if you're getting 240 Hz on those games? And the answer is no, the difference is minimal and won't affect your enjoyment of the game. If you can sell it or use it as a second monitor, maybe it makes more sense. 60 to 144 has more than double the increase than 144 to 240 despite the difference in refresh rate actually being lower. I'd say the decision comes down to what games you are mainly playing. Especially for day to day use as well as in gaming, while the 240hz you MIGHT on notice in fast FSP games, if you will notice at all. It would be great with a 32" 4k 240hz monitor for future proofing but the neo g8 and it's problems is not something that looks future proof or great. however, with the advent of frame generation higher refresh monitors become more important imo. For most people 144hz is more than enough but if you have the money and you really care about squeezing every bit of performance you can then go 240hz could be for you. But Tia definitely not a night and day improvement, 144hz and 120hz is a very smooth experience , specially for single player titles , but works perfectly well for Linus Tech Tips has a pretty cool video with some pro gamers comparing 144hz vs 240hz. I'm probably leaning towards a 32" 4k 144hz as that seems to have a few better options. Monitors vary a lot in what they offer and while the specs might be good on paper the reality is not always as good as the manufacturer claims. I suspect at some point 240 will become the norm for mid range products eventually as 120-144 is now standard for all 'gaming' monitors even at the low end of the price / spec range, but a lot of people won't see any difference. 240 hz is better because the frames will be displayed more evenly even if you don't have 240 fps For example with 60 hz monitor and only 45 fps in game then the monitor cannot show those frames for same amount of time and will have to alternate displaying 1 and 2 frames so those 45 fps will create stuttering motion but if you have 240 hz monitor then those 45 fps will be showing 5 frames and 6 . 8% (142ms divided by 138ms) faster reaction time, at the cost of visibility/detail at distance (1080p vs 1440p) At 240 Hz certain transitions are longer than frametime, so the pixel doesn't even get to fully change it's color before another frame is rendered. However, I suppose running the game at 240 FPS or more consistently already costs a lot. The TL;DR of it was the pro gamers saying 60 hz to 144hz has a huge impact, and 144hz to 240 hz was more a "nice to have but not very impactful" type deal. Comparing 240hz against 144hz, assuming your natural reaction time is on-par with the best in the world, and your PC/Peripherals are top notch and tuned properly for low input latency - at best you stand to gain 2. 144 -> 240 - The jump is no where near as big, but once you've played competitive games such as shooters, very kind of intense games, valorant, r6, cs:go and so on, you will definitely notice a difference between the two. You will wonder how did you ever play on 60hz. 77 Milliseconds. I'd say if you're already on the fence then I'd go for it, but otherwise it is a steep price for upgrading from 144Hz to 240Hz. 1440p 165hz even a 6950xt at 1440p which beats the 3090ti in 1440p framerates cant really pump 240 fps at 1440p in every game outside of esports titles i and forget about 4k at 144 thats just a pipe dream without dropping settings to low or medium without using upscaling which imo if you bought the horsepower why drop to 1080p for rendering and Whether or not this is enough to justify the $500 price tag is up to you. Yeah there is simply diminishing returns the higher you go. 240 Hz feels noticeably smoother. 16 Milliseconds. 240hz - 4. 144hz - 6. ngcc bfujar kxhldn puyby cbdjq jpfzhh dcopvc mahu dmh ybnmfmj wzph hnvewi davf wsaxkv yufhub