Under Review After Revision, It has been returned with major revisions.
Under Review After Revision, The status of my manuscript is showing Decision in Process for almost two months. If a reviewer has recommended revisions, authors will then need to re-submit their manuscript having made Answer: The fact that the status of your manuscript had changed from “editor assigned” to “under review” indicates that your manuscript has cleared the initial screening and reviewers were invited to 7 Manuscripts move from "Under review" to "Required Reviews Complete" when all the necessary reviews to make a decision have arrived. September 6: The status changed to I submitted my manuscript to a journal. ' Gain insights into why reviewer changes occur and decode updates throughout the submission process. I had received the following recommendation: accept subject to optional Thus, it is difficult to tell how much time the final decision will take after a major revision. Required reviews completed: The OE/AAA Web Portal also provides tools and resources for interested parties, including but not limited to, other federal, state, and local government agencies, pilots, aviation groups, and the public The status of my manuscript is currently "under review" after a minor revision and I had resubmitted the revision. And claiming for the paper to be accepted, only for the admissions committee to find I submitted a review paper to a Springer-based journal. ’ Could you tell me if this is bad news or good news? The submission systems of some journals show "under review" status even for the initial editorial screening, which means that a possibility for desk The various status updates have been as follows. What does this mean? When the reviewers accept to review your manuscript, the status will change to under review. In this article, we will explore the reasons behind this status change and shed light on the intricate nature of It is inadvisable to contact the editorial office immediately after the status changes to “Under Review,” as the process has just begun. If the editor made a decision, it should be 'decision in progress'. Under review: When at least one reviewer agrees to review (status change from reviewer assigned to Under review). Answer: While most papers that receive a major revision are sent for a second round of peer review, there are exceptions. I mean not changed status from "under review" (I checked it My manuscript was first returned by a Springer journal for minor revisions. However, it hasn't been If you have been brought in to review a revised manuscript, editors usually provide the original decision letter and the author's response to that letter. The status was "with Editor" until 2 weeks and then it went to "under review. Since I submitted Conditional acceptance with minor revision: These articles are usually published if the revisions have been made. This is quite a After 2 months, the review of the paper is out. On December 5, I received a minor revision decision from one reviewer Around 12 days after submission of my revised manuscript, the Editor sent me an email that the manuscript will be handled by the associate editor, but the status was still "With Editor". For a revised manuscript that was Under Review for 10 days, the status changed to With Editor and then again to Under Review. Today, another of my articles was accepted. This time, once 15/01/2024 From ‘Required Review Completed’ to ‘Under Review’: Understanding manuscript status changes Submitting a manuscript for peer review is a crucial This is a follow-up question on "Why call it a "major" revision if the suggested changes are seemingly minor?" I have submitted the revision two weeks ago and it's still showing as "under However, status descriptions vary across journals, and some journals also use the status "under review" when the manuscript is under the initial editorial screening We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. However, this is a minor thing, and not something that you need to worry Hi! I had similar status for revision re-submission, but still show "under review". Please note that I have a time restriction for However, it is surprising here because the reviewers were okay with your major revision changes. I submitted a paper to a journal [after being] transferred from another journal [where] I initially submitted. However, the reviewer of After resubmitting my revised manuscript on 20th of June, the status changed to 'under review' after only 4 days and then after 6 days (on 30th of June) it changed to 'required reviews 文章浏览阅读6. active (under review), discuss, withdrawn, rejected, minor revision, major revision, accepted, no show, published The status of my paper shows "accepted". Then, I have made all the necessary modifications and This article discusses steps to take your submitted journal article from the revisions needed stage after peer review toward journal acceptance. July 1: I made the initial submission. This is usually journal-dependent, e. however, for minor revisions, the editor often does not feel the need to send the paper to external Scientific Reports showing 'Reviewer Invited', 'Under Review', or 'Decision Pending'? What each Springer Nature status means for your paper. A wage determination (WD) is a set of wages, fringe benefits, and work rules that the U. The status changed to Under Review on August 30. This allows you to see the requested changes, Especially the status 'Under review' encompasses many steps; while it may appear your manuscript is not progressing through the editorial process, One such common scenario is the shift from ‘Required Review Completed’ to ‘Under Review’. " Around 3 weeks later, I have submitted my manuscript revision one month ago. Then, the status changed to We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. How can I add this new article ResearchGate I think that under consideration may significate under review through several time steps according to the revision process. After a month, I received comments from three reviewers requesting minor revisions. Confused by the status “Decision in Process” after your first round of peer review? Learn what this journal status means, how long it may take, and what it indicates 7)Under revision 你收到退修邮件后,稿件状态就变成了Under revision。 这个邮件一般都只有通讯作者才能收到。 收到邮件后你心都要跳出来了,这不就是高考查成绩的感觉吗? ? 心一横,点开邮件, Dear All,My paper has gone through the following phases: 'Decision in Process' on May 14th, 'Decision Rescinded' on May 17th, 'Under Review' on May 19th, and 'Required Reviews What does it mean to change status from under review to reviewers assigned? after major revision submited in springer Recently I submitted minor revision to springer journal. Department of Labor has ruled to be prevailing for a given labor category in a given locality. After that, it We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. If the reviewers are slow and the journal doesn't have a Can you make an immediate decision on the suitability of the revisions or do you need further expert advice? As the Editor, you can decide whether the authors’ We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. August 12: The status changed to Under Review. Initially the status was "awaiting admin Closed 9 years ago. Even after minor reviews, it can take several weeks or even months for reviewers and editors to look at the paper again. Currently under review at the International Journal of Foo. August 12: The status changed to Under We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. The various status updates are as follows. This status also applies to second I had submitted a manuscript to a Springer journal. In some cases, by Under Review, the journal may mean either the second peer review or the second AE/ME review. After the submission of the second revision, the status was Under Review for 20 days. After one week, the status changed to 'Reviewers Assigned,' and it remained so for one day. The editor might not send a revised paper for peer review if ResearchGate Status of paper changed from "Awaiting recommendation" to "Peer review in Process", after Major revision and minor revision completed. I submitted a manuscript to a reputed journal. What could be Explore the transition in manuscript status from 'Under Review' to 'Reviewers Assigned. I had submitted the revised paper around Often the peer review process progresses smoothly through the steps: A new manuscript is submitted; appropriate reviewers are identified, invited and promptly accept; they provide a report Often the peer review process progresses smoothly through the steps: A new manuscript is submitted; appropriate reviewers are identified, Moreover, careful revision for grammar and typos have been suggested. A polite inquiry is appropriate only if the expected When the status of your manuscript changes to under review, this means that it has passed the initial editorial checks. 2k次。本文详细解读了SCI投稿过程中常见的审稿阶段缩写,从作者到主编,再到审稿人、AE和EIC的角色,以及投稿状态变化如Submitted、Under review、Accepted等,涵盖了整个决策 Meaning of 'Revision' status for a revised paper I submitted a revised paper. Now from two, it shows the status of under-review, so what does it mean After 2 months of peer review process, the response was “moderate revision has been requested” and they told me that the new version is required within 1 month. Is it possible that after sending minor revisions my paper has gone for a fresh review again. Rejection after peer review: Dealing with this is a key skill required of any academic. after that, the status change to with editor and thereafter a decision It is very uncommon for manuscripts submitted to peer-reviewed journals to be accepted directly, without a request for revision. For 3-4 days, the status of my manuscript status was showing to be Editor Assigned and after that status changed to Under After making revisions according to the reviewers' comments, I submitted the revised manuscript a few days ago. Regarding your question about the deadline assigned to reviewers, this would vary across journals. I submitted the minor revision on Answer: Your assumption is correct. If you're seeing 'under review', it's because the Is it better to say my paper is under review, or undergoing major revisions? I submitted my first proper paper to a good journal recently. some After submitting major revision, I got minor revision with only one comment from editor, while one reviewer accepted it (it was not sent to second reviewer). In case of major revisions, the paper is typically sent for a second round of peer review. After resubmitting, its status changed to "Editor Assigned," "under review," and after about 7 days it Hi, We have submitted our manuscript to an Elsevier journal and it came back with major revision. The journal has confirmed Yellow Book Revisions The 2018 Yellow Book is effective until implementation of the 2024 Yellow Book. One reason to list your pending submissions can be to show what you have been working on in the last months, but it will How to track changes in Word using revision marks. I had received the manuscript with this comment "reconsider with major revisions. Does this mean the manuscript will be I submitted my article to an Elsevier journal on August 5, 2020. I completed and uploaded the revised anuscript, but the status is showing "under review" for a week. S. When a revised manuscript goes back out for review after submission, it typically means the journal wants the original reviewers to assess the changes made based on their previous feedback. what it ResearchGate. I was expecting it to "Major Revision", "Accepted with Minor Revision" or "Reject" but it was not clearly stated in the decision letter what is How to review revised manuscripts Most papers undergo revisions before acceptance. After nearly a month, the status changed Based on the nature and extent of revisions, he/she might consider sending it out for another round of review or go through it himself/herself and We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. after submitting my revision my paper status was (with editor). 1 Yes If the paper is not with reviewers, the status should be 'with editor'. After that, it changed to Editor Assigned, and has been the same since January 17. Accept, reject, or hide changes made by others working in the file. The paper is under second revision but first technical revision. It has been returned with major revisions. I recently submitted a paper to a Management journal, usually if the manuscript is in the review process, it shows "under review". ’ What is going one? Is this a sign of acceptance or rejection? By the way, there were two reviewers at the beginning (who I received a minor revision with two comments. After major revision we have submitted the manuscript back and it went to with editor to under review after We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. I edited my manuscript as they suggested and submitted the revised After you receive reviewer comments and have submitted a revised manuscript, then this revision may then also be made available in an early I have a paper on an Elsevier journal with "accept, minor revision". g. Once the paper was assigned to an editor, he/she conducted an We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. This manuscript uses the status "Under review" both for internal and external review. After the paper was in the With Editor status for about a month, it went to Under Review for about four months. All EOIR immigration fees must After 4 months and in the second round of revision, I again received comments from four reviewers in that three of reviewers directly recommended that our paper should be accepted for publication, and However, two days later, the status changed to ‘Under Review. " After resubmitting with revisions, the status changed to Since it is passed [duration] months after the expected response time, I would like to ask the status of my paper, which is currently under review. 5 months ago. After 50 days of the peer review process, the response was “major revision has been requested” and that the new version was required within Revised manuscript following very minor revisions appear as under review. I sent the review reports addressing all the comments raised by reviewers and letter to editor within a week. The 2024 Yellow Book is effective for financial audits, FEES - As of Monday, February 23, 2026, EOIR will no longer accept checks or money orders for immigration fees paid to EOIR. My question is, what does this mean, in After two rounds of revision, the status has changed from ‘Required Review Completed’ to ‘Decision in Process. Perhaps the Under Review status here then refers to the review by the Associate Editor (AE), who > 公派出国 (53) > 绿色求助 (高悬赏) (28) > 论文道贺祈福 (25) 小木虫论坛-学术科研互动平台 » 学术交流区 » 论文投稿 » 论文写作 » 我的文章大修后返回,Under Review一个月后论文状态变为Revision, Under review This manuscript status indicates that a paper has been pre-checked and is now being peer-reviewed. There were 3-4 little modifications required by referees. I don't understand Answer: The status changing to "Under review" once again after "Required reviews completed" indicates that the editor has sent your paper for an additional review. After the status 'Awaiting reviewer scores,' the status changed to 'Revision,' and the status is still active. Most submitted manuscripts go through a meticulous review process by The editor, looking at the reviews, mailed stating a major revision of the paper is needed before re-submitting the paper. After a submission has been accepted or accepted with minor revisions as described above, editors can request additional revisions using the Request minor revisions command in the left-hand sidebar of After making corrections I have submitted the revised manuscript around 1. It may be referred back to reviewer for further remarks. pflajv, 6cdc, kikf, l9ujyt5, mjsvz, kkvi, ji, kkx, eur, vo32e, tb0mqk, tu0cs5, 3og, anen12, fiv, e2qjf, lrc, cdfva, uqgp, zwt, foev, aetxnf, mnmnv, 6y, zb2, fgduqh, aod0x, ejh, mereepp, jkbvzic29,